La vela virtuale non è stata mai così reale !
Re: Flight 2 #8. cam-lup protest Fix-Rar |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Matricola
|
OK that would be a help to me to know for sure about this situation.
Posted on: 2018/5/5 14:06
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 2 #8. cam-lup protest Fix-Rar |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Allievo
|
Send me the replay.
Is just for opinion from the PC, result of the match not change. Sailgood
Posted on: 2018/5/5 14:58
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 2 #8. cam-lup protest Fix-Rar |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Matricola
|
Thanks!
Replay sent
Posted on: 2018/5/5 16:37
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 2 #8. cam-lup protest Fix-Rar |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Matricola
|
Sorry, we are asking for real situation, so No "If's" are needed here. How you would as Jury decide and explain please, if that would be a proper Protest.
These Answer clarify nothing ! Regards, Alex
Posted on: 2018/5/10 22:21
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 2 #8. cam-lup protest Fix-Rar |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Allievo
|
I think it's clear what the committee would have decided. The committee expressed: At the more critical moment, if FIX luffs, there will be contact but not immediately, so CAM is still keeping clear. No rule breache. Furthermore, he wanted to explain a possible solution: If CAM starts to open sail 2 during the luff of FIX, FIX must grant room and time to CAM to complete the maneuver. If during the maneuver CAM loses spinnaker, FIX breaks rule 16.1. Sailgood for PC
Posted on: 2018/5/10 23:33
|
|||
|